Nicole Gorra

21 Rose Court, Staten Island, NY 10301

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i5-80

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

Policies surrounding individuals with disabilities that do not function from a deficit lens have been a relatively modern evolution. The once-dominant medical model that was applied as a one size fits all intervention regarded disability as a pathology warranting treatment. With the advent of new and more inclusive policies and legislature, disability studies have become a multifaceted discipline garnering the advocacy and resources it needs to engender change for the population. Outdated treatment models, infrastructure, and resources designed to serve the community are being reassessed through the more contemporary and inclusive lens of societal accommodation. The language surrounding individuals with disabilities has changed to a person first orientation, as there is power in language, and one is no longer relegated to their entire identity being their ability status. Although the stated supports progress and is cause to believe an inclusive society is on the horizon, the marginalization and exclusion of individuals with disabilities within most societal frameworks prevail; the hard work has only just begun. This literature will highlight the disparities and stigma surrounding individuals living with mental health disabilities while highlighting the policies, services, and resources surrounding the population that remain ineffective.

KEYWORDS:

Critical disabilities studies, mental health disability and race, policy research and disability, Kendra’s Law, Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT).

REFERENCES

1) Ameican Psychological Association (APA). (2013). Diagnostic and statistic manual of mental disorders (5 th ed.). https://doi.org/10/1176/appi.books9780890425596

2) Aneshensel, C. (2009). Toward explaining mental health disparities. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 50(4), 377- 394. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20617650

3) Ben-Moshe, L. (2011). Disabling incarceration: Connecting disability to divergent confinements in the USA. Critical Sociology, 39(3), 385-403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920511430864

4) Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2020, August 20). CDC releases 2019 youth risk behavior survey results. https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/data/yrbs/feature

5) Council on Social Work Education (CSWE). (2015). Educational policy and accreditation standards. https://cswe.org/Acredidation/Standards-and-Policies/2015-EPAS

6) Haque, O., & Stein, M. (2020). COVID-19 clinical bias, persons with disabilities, and human rights. Health and Human Rights, 22(2), 285-290. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27040018

7) Horejes, T. (2013). (Re)conceptualizing disability policy frameworks. Journal of Policy Practice, 12, 23-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/15588742.2013.739081

8) Langholz, H. (2014). Systemic barriers to mental health care: A qualitative study. Master of Social Work Clinical Research Papers: St Catherine University, 352. https://sophia.stkate.edu/msw_papers/352

9) Mental Health America (MHA). (2017, June 13). Position statement 13: Integration of mental and general health care. https://www.mhanational.org/issues/postion-statement-13-integration-mental-and-general-health-care

10) National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI). (2021, November 15). Letter to congressional committee leadership on mental health funding. https://www.nami.org/Advocacy/NAMI-Advocacy-Actions

11) National Association of Social Workers (NASW). (2021). NASW Code of Ethics. Washington, D.C. NASW Press. https://www.socialworkers.org/ethics/code-of-ethics

12) Perlin, M. (2003). Therapeutic jurisprudence and outpatient commitment law: Kendra’s Law as a case study. Public Policy and Law, 9, 183-208. http://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/fac_articles_chapters

13) Rochefort, D. (2018). The affordable care act and the faltering revolution in behavioral health care. International Journal of Health Services, 48(2). https://doi.org/101177/0020731417753674

14) Russell, S., & Fish, J. (2016). Mental health in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) youth. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12, 465-487. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093153

15) Scarbrough, J. (2018). The growing importance of mental health parity. American Journal of Law and Medicine, 44, 453- 474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098858818789432

16) Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2021). National survey on drug use and health (NSDUH). https://www.samhsa.gov/data/data-we-collect/nsduh-national-survey-drug-use-and-health

VOlUME 06 ISSUE 05 MAY 2023